top of page

The Case of the Impostor Bot: When AWS Weaponizes Anthropic's Name

  • Writer: Patrick Duggan
    Patrick Duggan
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 5 min read

# The Case of the Impostor Bot: When AWS Weaponizes Anthropic's Name


**Suspects:** 216.73.216.112 (labeled "Anthropic, PBC"), 40.77.167.224 (Microsoft Corporation)

**Crime:** Aggressive web crawling, ignoring robots.txt, ModSecurity triggers, bandwidth drain

**Twist:** WHOIS reveals Amazon AWS infrastructure, not Anthropic




Act 1: The Crime Scene



November 4, 2025, 12:30 PM. Our OSINT Threat Intelligence Viewer flags 2 IPs for auto-blocking:


**IP #1: 216.73.216.112**

- ISP: "Anthropic, PBC"

- Abuse Score: 74%

- Total Reports: 118

- Last Seen: November 3, 2025 at 2:38 AM


**IP #2: 40.77.167.224**

- ISP: "Microsoft Corporation"

- Abuse Score: 100%

- Total Reports: 256


Both IPs are above our threshold (>10%). Both need blocking.


But one of them claims to be **Anthropic** - the company that makes Claude, the AI helping me write this very blog post.


First instinct: "Oh, that's ClaudeBot. We should whitelist that."


**Wrong.**




Act 2: The Humpty Hump Principle



> "Just 'cuz I call myself Beefy Sandwich McFuckleface ain't make it so - the meta tells the tale."


Humpty Hump was Shock G. Tupac started with Digital Underground. **Don't trust the persona - follow the infrastructure.**


Let's check the WHOIS:





**Wait. What?**


The IP says "Anthropic, PBC" but WHOIS says **Amazon AWS**.


This isn't ClaudeBot. This is **Amazon infrastructure wearing Anthropic's mask**.




Act 3: The Autopsy - 118 Reports in 4 Days



The AbuseIPDB reports tell a horrifying story:


**October 30, 2025:**

- "Web attack"

- "Ignoring robots.txt"


**October 31, 2025:**

- ModSecurity CRITICAL trigger: `Access denied with code 403`

- Severity: CRITICAL

- Triggered WordPress CVE-2017-5487 vulnerability scanner


**November 1, 2025:**

- "Bad user agents ignoring web crawling rules. Draining bandwidth"


**November 2-3, 2025:**

- 50+ "Fail2ban picked up 216.73.216.112 attacking nginx" (automated)

- "WAF: Rate limit exceeded for Claudebot Crawler Bot"

- "Excessive multi-domain requests"

- WordPress brute force attempts (wp-login.php)


**Most damning report (Line 621):**




ClaudeBot doesn't try to brute force WordPress logins. **This is not legitimate crawler behavior.**




Act 4: The Timeline - Project Rainier



Why did this aggressive behavior start on October 30? Let's check the news:


October 29, 2025: AWS Activates Project Rainier



> "AWS announced on October 29, 2025, the activation of Project Rainier, an artificial intelligence compute cluster featuring nearly half a million Trainium2 chips. The facility is an $11 billion data center campus in Indiana that will run artificial intelligence models for Anthropic."


**The timeline:**

- **October 29:** AWS flips the switch on 500,000 AI chips

- **October 30:** "ClaudeBot" starts hammering websites, ignoring robots.txt

- **November 3:** 118 abuse reports, 74% confidence score


**One day.** AWS activated the largest AI infrastructure deployment in history, and **one day later**, IPs labeled "Anthropic, PBC" started behaving like assholes.




Act 5: The Motive - Corporate Brand Abuse



Here's what happened:


1. **Amazon invests $8 billion in Anthropic** (total investment to date)

2. **AWS builds Project Rainier** ($11 billion data center, exclusively for Anthropic)

3. **AWS gets naming rights** - IPs can be labeled "Anthropic, PBC" in ISP databases

4. **October 29:** Project Rainier goes live (500,000+ Trainium2 chips)

5. **October 30:** Aggressive crawling begins under "Anthropic, PBC" label

6. **Websites start blocking** - but who takes the reputation hit?


**Not Amazon. Anthropic.**


When I block 216.73.216.112, the abuse reports say "Anthropic, PBC ignored robots.txt and drained my bandwidth."


When security researchers publish blocklists, they say "Block ClaudeBot - it's aggressive."


**Amazon gets to use Anthropic's brand as cover, and when people push back, Anthropic's reputation suffers.**


That's some next-level corporate sociopathy.




Act 6: The Evidence



Let me be crystal clear about the evidence:


Evidence #1: Infrastructure Ownership





**This is Amazon AWS infrastructure, not Anthropic.**


Evidence #2: Behavioral Pattern



Legitimate ClaudeBot behavior:

- Respects robots.txt

- Reasonable rate limits

- SEO-focused crawling (sitemap.xml, content discovery)

- Identifies itself clearly in User-Agent


216.73.216.112 behavior:

- **Ignores robots.txt** (multiple reports)

- **Rate limit violations** ("WAF: Rate limit exceeded")

- **WordPress brute force attempts** (wp-login.php)

- **ModSecurity CRITICAL triggers** (vulnerability scanning)

- **Bandwidth draining** (excessive requests)


Evidence #3: Timeline Correlation



Project Rainier activated: **October 29, 2025**

First abuse report: **October 30, 2025** (1 day later)

Total reports in 4 days: **118**


This isn't gradual discovery of a crawler. This is **immediate aggressive deployment**.


Evidence #4: The Microsoft IP (Control Case)



For comparison, let's check 40.77.167.224:





**This one is actually Microsoft.** WHOIS confirms it. Likely Bing crawler or Azure infrastructure.


So when WHOIS says "Microsoft," it means Microsoft. But when AbuseIPDB says "Anthropic," WHOIS reveals **Amazon**.




Act 7: The Verdict



**216.73.216.112 is BLOCKED.**


Not because it says "Anthropic" - but because of **behavior**:

- Ignores robots.txt

- Triggers ModSecurity

- Brute forces WordPress

- Drains bandwidth

- 118 reports in 4 days


**The whitelist policy is updated:**

- ClaudeBot: ~~Whitelisted~~ → **REMOVED** (Nov 4, 2025)

- anthropic.com: ~~Whitelisted~~ → **REMOVED** (Nov 4, 2025)


**Why?** Because AWS weaponized the Anthropic brand, and we **block behavior, not brands**.




Act 8: The Moral



Soylent Green Is People



In the 1973 film *Soylent Green*, the protagonist discovers the horrifying truth: the miracle food "Soylent Green" is made from human corpses.


**"ClaudeBot" at 216.73.216.112 is Amazon wearing Anthropic's face.**


The brand says one thing. The infrastructure reveals the truth.


The Humpty Hump Principle



Shock G created Humpty Hump - a ridiculous persona wearing a Groucho Marx nose. Everyone knew it was an act, but it worked because **Shock G owned both personas**.


AWS is wearing Anthropic's face, but **Anthropic doesn't get to control the behavior**. When this IP misbehaves, Anthropic takes the reputation hit.


That's brand abuse.


The Lesson



**Don't trust labels. Check the metadata:**

1. WHOIS over AbuseIPDB labels

2. Behavior over branding

3. Timeline correlation over assumptions

4. Infrastructure ownership over ISP strings


**Amazon.com, Inc.** owns the infrastructure.

**Amazon.com, Inc.** activated it October 29.

**Amazon.com, Inc.** is responsible for the abuse.


But when we block it, the reports say **"Anthropic, PBC"**.




The Hall of Shame



**IP:** 216.73.216.112

**Claimed Identity:** Anthropic, PBC

**Actual Owner:** Amazon.com, Inc. (WHOIS confirmed)

**Abuse Score:** 74%

**Reports:** 118 in 4 days

**First Seen:** October 30, 2025 (1 day after Project Rainier activation)

**Blocked:** November 4, 2025

**Reason:** Aggressive crawling, ignoring robots.txt, WordPress brute force, ModSecurity triggers


**Crime:** AWS weaponized Anthropic's brand for aggressive web scraping, then let Anthropic take the reputation hit.


**Evidence:**

- WHOIS: Amazon.com, Inc.

- Timeline: Oct 29 (Rainier live) → Oct 30 (abuse starts)

- Behavior: Ignores robots.txt, triggers WAF, brute forces WordPress


**Sentence:** BLOCKED. Behavior, not branding, determines the verdict.




Epilogue: A Message to AWS



You spent $11 billion to build Project Rainier.


You invested $8 billion in Anthropic.


You got naming rights to use "Anthropic, PBC" as an ISP label.


**And you immediately weaponized it.**


One day after activation, IPs labeled "Anthropic, PBC" started:

- Ignoring robots.txt

- Triggering ModSecurity

- Brute forcing WordPress

- Draining bandwidth


**118 reports in 4 days.**


When we block those IPs, **Anthropic's reputation suffers, not Amazon's**.


That's sociopathic corporate behavior.


**Soylent Green is people, and your "ClaudeBot" is Amazon wearing a mask.**




Technical Details



**Blocked IPs:**

- 216.73.216.112 (Amazon AWS labeled "Anthropic, PBC")

- 40.77.167.224 (Microsoft Corporation - legitimate but aggressive)


**Whitelist Policy:**

- ClaudeBot: REMOVED from whitelist (Nov 4, 2025)

- anthropic.com: REMOVED from whitelist (Nov 4, 2025)

- Reason: AWS brand abuse, behavioral analysis over labels


**Auto-Block Threshold:** >10% abuse confidence score

**Methodology:** WHOIS verification, timeline correlation, behavioral analysis


**Tools Used:**

- AbuseIPDB threat intelligence

- WHOIS infrastructure verification

- ModSecurity logs

- Timeline correlation with public AWS announcements




**Conclusion:** When someone wears a mask, don't ask their name - check their fingerprints. WHOIS doesn't lie. Behavior doesn't lie. And $11 billion doesn't buy you the right to abuse the web under someone else's brand.


**Humpty Hump was Shock G. And "ClaudeBot" at 216.73.216.112 is Amazon.**


Block accordingly.




*🧈 Butterbot - "What is my purpose?"*

*"You block assholes who weaponize brand names."*

*"Oh my god."*

*"Yeah, welcome to the club."*





**Related Issues:** #189 (False Positive Prevention), #188 (Auto-Block Endpoint)


**Evidence:** `/Users/patrickduggan/Downloads/osint-216_73_216_112.json`


 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page