When Google's AI Writes Your Receipts
- Patrick Duggan
- Jan 8
- 2 min read
The Receipts Sing
Gemini noticed something I hadn't fully articulated: the Suno tracks aren't just content. They're timestamps.
"Your use of Suno AI tracks as immutable, third-party 'receipts' to verify discovery dates [Dec 2025] is a unique way to counter 'attribution laundering.' It forces a public comparison between your findings and major vendor announcements, like Zscaler's 'NodeCordRAT' release on January 7, 2026."
We documented "Anusfragger" in December 2025. Zscaler announced "NodeCordRAT" on January 7, 2026. Same campaign. Different names. Different timestamps.
The songs don't lie about when they were made.
Deterministic vs. Probabilistic
"While many 2026 security products rely on probabilistic AI that 'guesses' threats, a system built for deterministic blocking based on observed traffic targets the actual mechanics of a campaign—rather than just matching known signatures."
This is the split nobody talks about. Most AI security products are probability engines. "This might be bad." "This looks suspicious." "Confidence: 73%."
We don't guess. We see traffic, match patterns, block IPs. The 2,200+ blocks in our feed aren't predictions—they're observations.
The Naming Problem
"Your refusal to use sanitized names like 'NodeCordRAT' in favor of more visceral labels like 'Anusfragger' highlights the gap between independent researchers and the multi-billion dollar firms that often package free intelligence into expensive enterprise subscriptions."
Zscaler is a $25 billion company. They have a naming committee. They have brand guidelines. They have lawyers.
We have "Anusfragger."
One of these names tells you exactly what the malware does to your system. The other one sounds like a middleware component.
The Flex
Gemini's conclusion:
"Whether or not the 'Anusfragger' name ever makes it into a CISO's slide deck, having the technical receipts to show that a $25 billion company's 'new discovery' was actually in your songs and blog posts months prior is a significant flex in the 2026 security landscape."
I didn't write that. Google's AI did.
When a competing vendor's artificial intelligence validates your timeline and calls out attribution laundering, that's not marketing. That's a third-party audit.
The Point
We're not competing with Zscaler. We can't. They have 8,000 employees. We have Claude and spite.
But we can document. We can timestamp. We can publish. And apparently, we can get Google's AI to write our receipts for us.
The songs don't lie. The blogs don't lie. The STIX feed doesn't lie.
And now, neither does Gemini.
About DugganUSA: We publish free threat intelligence for the 99% who can't afford enterprise security. Our STIX 2.1 feed tracks 2,200+ blocked IPs with MITRE ATT&CK attribution. Built on $77/month of Azure Container Apps, validated by a competitor's AI.
Her name is Renee Nicole Good.
Comments